MNF Showdown · LV vs PIT
NFL 2025 | Week 11 | Mon, Nov 17, 2025 | MNF
Winning lineup
| POS | PLAYER | OWN | SAL | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPTAIN | G. Pickens PIT WR | 8.4% | 13500 | 48.6 |
| FLEX | C. Lamb DAL WR | 52.4% | 11000 | 17.6 |
| FLEX | D. Prescott DAL QB | 64.6% | 10400 | 25.32 |
| FLEX | B. Bowers LV TE | 62.9% | 8000 | 14.2 |
| FLEX | T. Tucker LV WR | 29.3% | 6600 | 14.7 |
| FLEX | H. Luepke DAL RB | 2.3% | 400 | 7.1 |
Analysis
Stack summary
This is a slate where the captain slot carries the win. Pickens captain at modest ownership produces a score high enough to outrun the chalk captain cluster, which forces the rest of the lineup into a simple job: avoid mistakes and stay correlated with the scoring environment.
Dallas pieces remain chalky for good reason. Prescott plus Lamb captures the most bankable connection on the slate. The lineup does not overthink Dallas beyond that pairing. Instead, it uses Luepke as the micro-leverage piece. A $400 role player scoring 7.1 rarely feels necessary, but in Showdown it can be perfect. It frees salary, reduces duplication, and still stays connected to Dallas touchdown sequences through goal line snaps, short receptions, or cleanup carries.
The Raiders side is a clean two piece response. Bowers provides volume and red zone access, Tucker provides a secondary receiver who can spike without needing massive target share. The build assumes Las Vegas produces enough to keep Dallas throwing, while Pickens captain represents the slate breaking single player outcome. Even without a Steelers quarterback present, a receiver captain can win when production comes from explosive plays and concentrated touchdowns.
Uniqueness notes
The uniqueness is not a full contrarian lineup, it is a specific kind of risk. The captain slot takes the aggressive stance, while the flex slots lean into stability and correlation.
Luepke is the most instructive inclusion. Many builds chase a mid-tier flex who projects better, then end up sharing salary shapes. A cheap player with a real role can outperform a thin mid-tier option on a single touchdown or a few touches, and the salary savings can keep the rest of the lineup optimal.
A repeatable takeaway: when you land a slate breaking captain, you do not need six contrarian plays. You need five pieces that fit the game story and avoid the most duplicated salary patterns.
Build details
Team split: 3-2-1
Build type: Contrarian WR captain with chalk DAL core and cheap salary release
Includes QBs: Yes
Primary lever: Captain slot separates the lineup from the field’s common builds
Secondary lever: A very low salary flex creates a less duplicated salary shape while staying connected to scoring
Compare Your Lineup
Format
Screenshot uploaded
Winning lineup 127.52 PTS $49,900 SALARY 219.90% OWN
Comparison
Upload a screenshot to begin
Your lineup
Winning lineup
Difference
Click a Your Lineup value or edit parsed rows to complete the comparison.
Parsed rows
Total points
Pending extraction
127.52
—
Salary used
Pending extraction
$49,900
—
Total role ownership
Pending extraction
219.90%
—
Shared players
Pending extraction
Winning lineup only
—
Players you had that the winner did not
Pending extraction
Winning lineup only
—
Players the winner had that you did not
Pending extraction
Winning lineup only
—
Captain / MVP comparison
Pending extraction
G. Pickens
—