TNF Showdown · DAL vs PHI
NFL 2025 | Week 1 | Thu, Sep 04, 2025 | TNF
Winning lineup
| POS | PLAYER | OWN | SAL | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPTAIN | J. Williams DAL RB | 4.0% | 8100 | 30.6 |
| FLEX | S. Barkley PHI RB | 68.3% | 11200 | 18.4 |
| FLEX | J. Hurts PHI QB | 74.1% | 11000 | 24.28 |
| FLEX | C. Lamb DAL WR | 40.0% | 10800 | 21 |
| FLEX | B. Aubrey DAL K | 27.5% | 4800 | 11 |
| FLEX | J. Dotson PHI WR | 5.8% | 3200 | 8.9 |
Analysis
Stack summary
This build wins by pairing a low owned captain with the safest, most obvious flex anchors. Javonte at captain creates the separation. Hurts and Barkley supply floor plus touchdown access, so the lineup stays alive even if captain does not post an extreme score.
Dallas scoring gets captured through three channels. Javonte handles the touchdown path. Lamb handles yardage and volume. Aubrey cleans up drives that stall. Philadelphia scoring gets captured through Hurts plus Barkley, which covers rushing touchdowns, passing yards, and red zone outcomes without needing a second Eagle pass catcher.
The construction behaves well in a game where both offenses move the ball and the final points spread across drives instead of a single receiver dominating. The lineup does not chase a fragile double stack. It buys the whole scoring surface on each side.
Uniqueness notes
Ownership tells the story. The flex portion is popular by design, so first place comes from captain choice. A 4.0 percent captain attached to a stable flex core creates a path where many rosters tie five spots and lose on the one decision.
The kicker slot matters here. Many builds skip kicker when paying for Hurts, Barkley, Lamb. Aubrey fits because Dallas drives still produce points even when touchdowns do not appear on every trip. Dotson adds one cheap, low owned completion route that can beat other salary savers.
Build details
Team split: 3-3
Build type: Low owned RB captain with chalk flex anchors and a kicker capture
Includes QBs: Yes
Primary lever: Captain leverage against common Hurts and Barkley builds
Secondary lever: Kicker plus one cheap receiver to finish salary without sacrificing drive based scoring
Compare Your Lineup
Format
Screenshot uploaded
Winning lineup 114.18 PTS $49,100 SALARY 219.70% OWN
Comparison
Upload a screenshot to begin
Your lineup
Winning lineup
Difference
Click a Your Lineup value or edit parsed rows to complete the comparison.
Parsed rows
Total points
Pending extraction
114.18
—
Salary used
Pending extraction
$49,100
—
Total role ownership
Pending extraction
219.70%
—
Shared players
Pending extraction
Winning lineup only
—
Players you had that the winner did not
Pending extraction
Winning lineup only
—
Players the winner had that you did not
Pending extraction
Winning lineup only
—
Captain / MVP comparison
Pending extraction
J. Williams
—